Thursday, April 7, 2011

'You're terrible, Muriel'

I watched "Muriel's Wedding" earlier this morning for the umpteenth time (but for the first time all the way through since my visit to Australia) and just noticed some peculiar anachronisms.

(Spoiler space for a 17-year-old film:)









The most glaring anachronism is at the beginning of the film, when Muriel receives a blank check (or cheque, since we're talking about Australia) from her mom with a date in January 1994. When she pays back her father, however, near the end, the cheque (below) is dated from November 1992!


The second "when the heck did this happen?" moment involves a key plot point -- when Muriel marries a South African swimmer who can't compete for his home country because of international sanctions. The swimmer needs to marry an Australian so he can gain citizenship and can compete internationally. Yet Apartheid was effectively over, however, when the film was released (in September 1994). In fact, South Africa had already had free and fair elections, resulting in Nelson Mandela's presidency. To top it off, the movie mentions a South African "civil war" that never happened.

Fact of the matter, South Africa had already been reinstated in international sporting, as seen in "Invictus," and had competed at the 1992 Olympics. You might say that "maybe the film is supposed to be set earlier," with the cheque dates as inconsequential, but the movie does mention the 1992 Olympic gold medal won by Aussie Kieren Perkins.

Despite its time-travel foibles, I still enjoy Muriel's Wedding It's a fun, musical and ultimately uplifting flick -- albeit one apparently set in a parallel universe.

"Goodbye Porpoise Spit!"

Monday, March 21, 2011

No such thing as too much ice cream

Ian and I went to McDonalds in Pacifica today, and I ordered a burger and he ordered a sundae. The sundae was ready before the burger and a worker put it on our tray. I handed it to Ian and asked him to find a seat.

Another McDonalds worker helping the first, not seeing that we had already received it, looked at our receipt and helpfully went to get us our sundae. When he brought the sweet back, I pointed out we had already gotten our sundae.

I was told I can keep it, as it would just be thrown away. My lucky day!

Time to pay it forward -- I saw a homeless guy in front of the restaurant who looks as if he could use a couple bucks.

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Those crazy Masons!

Reading a bit about anti-Freemason movements today in Wikipedia, I found this gem:

"Historically, complaints have been made that the Masons have secretly plotted to create a society based on the revolutionary ideals of liberty, equality, fraternity, separation of church and state and (in Nazi Germany) a Jewish plot for religious tolerance."

My God! Hide your children from these devils!

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Yes, I CAN take pictures here ...

A racist jerk in my neighborhood, right as he rushed me.

I live in a nice neighborhood, Winston Manor in South San Francisco. It's clean, well-maintained, ethnically heterogeneous, and -- other than having to suffer the occasional annoyance of lazy neighbors parking on the opposite side of the street (i.e., facing the wrong direction) -- it's never bugged me in the eight-plus years I've lived here. Until today.

We have a friend renting out our "library" for a few months as he's just re-located to the Bay Area and needs to get settled. He's enjoyed the town thus far, and has taken walks to the nearby park the last several days. He came back this evening and showed me the following entry he had just put on his Facebook page:



Say what? My friend just wanted to shoot some snaps of our neighborhood for out-of-town friends on the Internet when some idjit tried to shut him down, called him an "Ay-rab" and warned that he could get "shot" if he continued (you know, the "threat that's not an outright threat" game). I was a bit irritated as you can imagine. So what did I do? See if it could happen to me, of course.

Having both a journalism degree (which included courses in media law) and three years dispatching for the police, I know I can take pictures in public with hardly any restrictions. Even a quick Google search will show multiple websites that say taking pictures of houses from the sidewalk is permissible. While it is courteous to ask permission, it is not required for personal, non-commercial purposes like those of my friend.

After asking my friend to stay behind (in order to see if a white person would get the same reception), I began walking down Arlington Drive, in the direction where my friend said the confrontation happened. I occasionally pointed my camera at houses as I walked down the sidewalk at a steady, brisk pace. I rarely actually took a picture. To be perfectly clear, not once did I take any pictures of people or through open windows. And just to prove my point, that we were doing no more than what is already on the Internet, here's a link to the Google Streetview of the area.

About a third of the way down the block, someone on the opposite side of the street stepped out on their porch, yelled "Turn around!" then "Smile!" as they took my picture. I complied -- hey, I was in public and fair game. I thought, "OK, that was probably where (my friend) had his problem," and figured they weren't giving me as many problems because I was white. I kept walking, to finish my loop of the neighborhood.

But about 200 feet down the street, at about the point on the Streetview map above, a burly white man in his late 30s/early 40s, wearing an unflattering sweatsuit combo, approached me and asked what I was doing. I flipped on voice memo on my iPhone and recorded the following:

John (J): "I'm just taking pictures."
Burly Racist Ass (BRA): "Why?"
J: "Frankly my friend, that's not your business."
BRA: "You can't take pictures of houses, that's violating people's privacy."
J: "No sir, it's not. I'm on public property."

At this point I began walking away, in the same direction I was originally heading. All of a sudden, the man gently swiped my foot with his foot and then did it again when I kept walking. It was after that second time that I warned him that I was recording the whole conversation and that was the second time he had kicked me.

BRA (realizing his situation): "I didn't kick you. You need to ask people if you can take pictures."
J: "May I take your picture, my friend?"
BRA: "Yes."

As soon as I pulled out my camera and pointed it, the man pounced. He rushed me, tried to grab my camera (which I protected in my hand) and managed to break the strap (right). I was a bit surprised at how well I kept my temper, and our conversation continued.

J: "You just assaulted me."
BRA: "I didn't assault you."
J: "I've got it on tape." (Actually on flash memory.)
BRA: "All you have is us talking."

I asked his name (to which he offered a colorful non-sequitor), asked him to pay $10 for the broken camera strap (he refused) then told him I didn't appreciate him calling my friend an "Ay-rab," (double wrong because my friend isn't of Middle-Eastern descent). "We don't have room for racists in this neighborhood," I said, then walked off.

The man then mumbled something about talking to another neighbor, who he said was a cop, and stormed off. "Whatever," I said, knowing I was in the right, and continued on my walk. I got to the bottom of the hill, then walked back up to my house on the other side of the street. All my interactions with people on the other side of the street were congenial.

I never saw the burly guy again, and my friend later confirmed (via description and blurry picture) that my confrontation was with the same person as was his.

What it comes down to is this: I have the right to take pictures on a public street. If you want to be suspicious of some otherwise nondescript people taking pictures in a public place, fine -- call the cops. Let them make sure the person isn't up to no good. Don't come roaring out of your house calling people racist names and try to grab their camera. I've half a mind to make this a weekly project, or organize a flash mob to go up and down the street taking pictures.

Oh, and if anyone still thinks I was violating privacy by taking pictures, here's a sample of the (now all-deleted) pictures I did take. It's my own house, and you can see the resolution was quite low.

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Oh, really? Nuts!


Allergen warnings are getting out of hand when they're telling you that your bag of peanuts may have been produced in a factory that processes peanuts.

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Literary decisions in haiku

In his book, The Heart Aroused: Poetry and the Preservation of the Soul in Corporate America (1994, Doubleday), author David Whyte recalls the epic hero Beowulf's battle with Grendel’s mother. Beowulf is forced to descend into the murky depths of a lake to face his fears — despite an urge to stay safe in the light. Whyte points out that the search for one’s own soul and the corresponding need to make a momentous, life-changing decision is a common theme in literature. Below, I enter the heads of other great literary (and one cinematic) characters as they make a decision — in haiku.

(Super-minor spoilers for classic literature):

Gilgamesh:
Enkidu, my friend
I wish I were more like you
Able to know me

Odysseus:
It’s a long way home
I’ll see my loving wife soon
But first, I explore

Beowulf:
The abyss beckons
His mother wants to kill me
But I find a sword

Dante:
Nine circles explored
I abandoned hope, entered
The soul’s journey ends

Elizabeth Bennet:
Marry for money?
Never! I’ll marry for love
Darcy? Not so bad …

Jo March:
Aunt March wants me home
I’d rather visit with Laurie
Beth, how I miss you

Anne Shirley:
Oh, that currant wine!
The red soil of my home
Won’t keep me rooted

Jay Gatsby:
Having a goal helps
I choose to be in West Egg
To be near Daisy

Tom Joad:
We came here for hope
California was no home
For Okie workers

Rick Blaine:
My café is free
What is important? Elsa
I will help Lazlo

Holden Caufield:
Too much phoniness
This school is not where you learn
Big Apple beckons

Atticus Finch:
Race should play no role
Justice needs an example
For my two children

Doctor Manhattan:
I am above them
Ozymandias is right
Deception saves man

Monday, December 6, 2010

What goes through a kid's mind at dinner

While I was in class tonight, the missus took the opportunity to take Ian out to dinner with a couple friends. If you ever wondered what a kid thinks while he's at a restaurant, just give him an iPhone and tell him to take notes.

My six-year-old wrote the following:

6:06 p.m. -- We are almost at the restaurant
6:44 p.m. -- We are now at the restaurant
6:45 p.m. -- We're at Outback Steakhouse
6:46 p.m. -- I like Outback Steakhouse
6:47 p.m. -- My food is not here yet
6:47 p.m. -- I am getting Chicken
6:48 p.m. -- Bread is here
6:48 p.m. -- But my food is not
6:49 p.m. -- I got Root Beer
6:51 p.m. -- They are getting my food
6:52 p.m. -- Outback Steakhouse is good
6:55 p.m. -- My Food is still not here
6:56 p.m. -- I like songs
(food comes, they eat, Ian resumes taking notes)
8:13 p.m. -- We we're at Outback Steakhouse
8:14 p.m. -- Sharkboy and Lavagirl are cool
8:15 p.m. -- Fireboy and Watergirl are cool also
8:17 p.m. -- I made up Sharkgirl and Lavaboy and Firegirl and Waterboy

Grammar and spelling as by the author. And "Sharkboy and Lavagirl" was horrible.

Saturday, December 4, 2010

Cricket is an evil sport

Like many cities, Perth offers special bus service to major sporting events. When I was last there, there was a club cricket match at the local oval. Why do I think cricket is evil (despite loving Lagaan)? Check out the special service route number on the bus.

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

My music collection, by the numbers


I was at the San Carlos Library today prior to a meeting and perused the compact disc section. It got me musing -- for the first time in a while, it seemed there was nothing there I wanted to copy.

I've admitted in the past to occassionally borrowing a CD from the library and copying its contents. I'm not proud of the practice, but I'm also not going to pay $14.99 for a CD that I want one song from. I consider it a minor copyright violation sin on the level of photocopying a page out of a library book.

Of course, there are sites where you can legally download single songs, such as the iTunes Music Store, Amazon.com/mp3, Rhapsody.com, etc., and I routinely use them. With that in mind, I did a quick perusal of my iTunes music library (above) and tried to figure out approximately what percentage of my digital music came from what source.

The early very-rounded guesstimates:

65 percent copied from CDs belonging to me or my family;
15 percent copied from library discs;
10 percent from legitimate online music purchases;
10 percent from, er, illicit means (old Napster, etc.).

Of the library and "illicit" numbers, I consider that I legitimately own about a third of that 25 percent because I've downloaded/copied a lot of music that I actually paid for years earlier in the form of cassettes but never replaced with CDs. So I guess we can figure that about 16 percent of my music has not been paid for (there goes the political career!). But to be honest, if I didn't buy it legitimately, I probably wouldn't (or couldn't) have bought it anyway.

In the comments, I'd love to hear about what percentage of my readers' music collection is "valid."

On a side note, I'd like to note that I think the San Carlos Library is one of the best, if not the best, in San Mateo County. Great CD and DVD collections, large graphic novel collection (of which only 50 percent is manga) and a large study area. Everyone sings the praises of San Mateo's new library, but I prefer San Carlos.

Saturday, November 13, 2010

South City keeps Bell, 29-22

I covered the annual Bell Game between nearby South San Francisco and El Camino highs this afternoon. I see about 15-20 games per year, and this was the best game I've seen in a long time. A combination of a tight game, a huge, enthusiastic crowd on both sidelines and some questionable officiating and coaching made this one memorable. I'm reprinting my story here because I knew the Times is going to going to butcher it for space. Hey, I gotta have my clips somewhere!

(The Times does have the story online with minimal cuts. I'll have to see what makes the actual paper on Sunday.)



SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO — Despite the tears in his eyes, El Camino coach Mark Turner held his thumb and forefinger just a smidgen apart and smiled.

“One inch,” Turner said. “For years, over the history of people playing sports, people have put their two fingers together and said they were ‘this close’ to winning. Usually it doesn’t mean they were that close to winning … but we were literally an inch away from winning.”

Turner was referring to a play that happened with 52 seconds left in Saturday afternoon’s 48th Bell Game between El Camino and host South San Francisco. The Warriors converted a critical 4th and 2, with the tip of the ball just touching the marker pole on the ensuing measurement, then scored on a 16-yard pass from Brad Los to sophomore Robert Johnson to secure a 29-22 win after a two-point conversion on the next play.

With the win, South City (5-4) retains the Bell and has won 39 of the contests between the two South San Francisco schools. El Camino just missed out on its 10th win in the series.

The rivalry inspired the game situation Saturday, coaches admitted. For example, take the case of the Warriors trying to make the critical fourth-down play instead of attempting about a 35-yard field goal. (Right: The referees award the first down to South City High as El Camino players, in red, look on.)

“Do we make that play against Menlo School? No,” said South City coach Frank Moro. “Maybe that little extra shot of adrenaline playing for a Bell in front of a big crowd (did it).”

But to even see how the Warriors got in a position for the winning score, one must regress to just after the Colts scored a go-ahead touchdown to lead 22-21 with just 2:42 left. Turner had El Camino line up for an onside kick, but South City recovered on their own 49 to set up the final drive, in which good starting position proved critical.

“If you don’t get the ball on the 50, maybe you don’t feel you have a chance and you start sputtering,” Moro said. “(The Warriors) didn’t give up. It was almost like a gift.”

Turner argued that South City had brought back the ball nearly to midfield on almost every kickoff anyway, and thought that by kicking it short some Colts player might get lucky.

“Our kickoff coverage team this year has been a little scary,” Turner said. “I know it’s something a lot of people are going to question in hindsight, but hindsight is 20-20.”

El Camino (5-5) had taken a 14-13 lead into halftime after pair of touchdown passes from Omar Kharrob to Justin Eclavea and Tyler Rios, for 16 and 5 yards, respectively. South San Francisco (5-4) had gotten its first half scores on a 59-yard run up the right from Falah Salem and JJ Vaioli’s eight-yard run.

After a scoreless third quarter, the Warriors broke through with 8:36 left in the game when Salem capped a 10-play, 94-yard drive by running the ball in two yards, then also brought in the two-point conversion to give South City a 21-14 lead.

El Camino then ate up the clock with a 13-play drive which culminated with Tajah Childs running a route up the right for a five-yard scoring reception with made it 21-20. Although Childs made the catch, the referees ruled he was interfered with and charged South City with a half-the-distance penalty on the PAT. With only four feet to go to the goal line, Turner played for the win and Nathan Huey barely made it in for a two-point conversion and a 22-21 El Camino lead with 2:42 left.

Salem led all rushers with 178 yards on 25 carries. DJ Peluso led the Colts with 104 yards on 17 carries, while Huey’s 26 rushes led to 79 total yards.

“We made a great defensive play and the tip of the ball met the pole. Maybe there was a lot of extra cushioning on the pole, but we were less than an inch from winning the game,” Turner said.

“I told the seniors to remember this date, Nov. 13, 2010. They’re going to remember it, but they’re going to remember it by that one inch.”



El Camino (5-5) 7 7 0 8 — 22
South San Francisco (5-4) 7 6 0 16 — 29

EC-Eclavea 16 pass from Kharrob (Reinke kick)
SSF-Salem 59 run (Torres kick)
SSF-Vaioli 8 run (kick failed)
EC-Rios 5 pass from Kharrob (Reinke kick)
SSF-Salem 2 run (Salem run)
EC-Childs 5 pass from Kharrob (Huey run)
SSF-Johnson 16 pass from Los (Bildhauer pass from Los)

EC SSF
Yards rushing 207 206
Yards passing 50 103
Total net yards 257 309
Turnovers 2 2
Fumbles 1 0
Fumbles lost 1 0

INDIVIDUAL RUSHING
EL CAMINO (att-yards) — Peluso 17-104, Huey 26-79, Kharrob 7-16, Samson 1-6, Carr 1-1, Childs 1-1.
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO — Salem 25-178, Los 3-15, Vaioli 2-14, Johnson 1-3, Bildhauer 1-(minus 2), Tufono 1-(minus 2).

INDIVIDUAL PASSING
EL CAMINO (com-att-yds-int) — Kharrob 7-18-50-1.
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO — Los 8-17-103-2.

INDIVIDUAL RECEIVING
EL CAMINO (rec-yds) — Eclavea 2-28, Rios 2-15, Childs 1-5, Peluso 1-2, Francesconi 1-0.
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO — Vaioli 3-29, Bildhauer 2-26, Salem 1-18, Johnson 1-16, Moro 1-7.

Three classes are killing me

Sorry for the dearth of posts, but I'm taking three classes this semester on top of gainful employment and the workload is killing me. But I've got some stuff coming up. Stay tuned.